To be clear; AT&T's beef isn't with what the ads say about its 3G network, but rather what it believes the ads might imply: The maps, AT&T says, could lead a consumer to believe the company has no wireless coverage whatsoever in the whited-out areas, rather than believing only that it has no 3G coverage in those spots (a fact AT&T does not dispute).



Read more here


Edited by vdub on November 14 2009 at 6:58am

__________________

You know I have stood quietly and not commented on this because the subject honestly pisses me off. Finlay I have had enough.

"AT&T just to let you know that 2G is not equal to 3G, in fact honestly I don't even consider it data coverage. Its worse then dial up and it costs me almost as much as my 12Mb home cable connection. Your basing this argument on the fact that Verizon didn't include your 2G covrage in there 3G commercial because it makes you look bad. IT SHOULD MAKE YOU LOOK BAD. Instead of wasting peoples time and money spend the money on upgrading your network so people like me have a decent data connection because soon if it doesn't happen I will be going to Verizon.



Read the full story here.


__________________