| |
|
Corsair TwinX1024-3200LLPro
(introduction) |
Page read
6514
times |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 More times then not I see people sacrifice
their memory to save money on their systems and with technologies coming out as fast as
they are, this is getting to be a big problem. There have been many
times where I have had to trouble shoot the latest dual channel
motherboards because of blue screening and unstable behavior and the
problem ends up being memory that was not intended to run on a dual
channel platform. In this article we will not only show the performance
difference in running ultra low latency memory against your every day
value ram, but we will also go in to why dual channel optimization and
low latency is important in today's computers. |
|
|
|
Test system spec's |
- AMD 3200+ (2.2GHz)
- ASUS A7N8X-Deluxe version.1.4 (BIOS 1007)
- 2X Kingston PC-3200 512MB Value ram & 2X Corsair TwinX PC-3200
LL-Pro 512MB
- Windows XP SP1
|
|
Benchmarks |
- 3DMark 2001
- Sandra Memory Bandwidth
- Return to Castle Wolfenstein
- Unreal Tournament 2003
|
|
Test Memory
Comparison single stick |
| |
Kingston
PC-3200 Value RAM |
Corsair
TwinX PC-3200 LL-Pro |
|
Memory Speed |
400 MHz |
400 MHz |
|
Memory Capacity |
512 MB |
512 MB |
|
CAS Latency |
3 |
2 |
|
RAS to CAS Delay |
3 |
3 |
|
RAS pre-charge |
3 |
2 |
|
Cycle time (tRAS) |
8 |
6 |
|
Dual optimized |
NO |
YES |
|
Heat spreaders |
NO |
YES |
|
Warranty |
Lifetime |
Lifetime |
|
|
|
Now let's move on and talk about how latency and duel channel affects
performance. |
|
|
|
Next
Impact of Technology >>> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talk
about this review in the Forum |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
