| |
|
Intel Desktop Board D875PBZ
(3DMark) |
Page read
1087
times |
| |
|
|
|
3DMark 2001 SE |
 |
The 3DMark 2001 scores did not show a big difference from the nForce
II
system. They Intel system did however win by getting about a 4% higher
score. The FSB did make a small improvement in the nForce II system rising
its score by 2.6% bringing the nForce II within 1.4% of the P4's score. |
 |
|
|
|
3DMark 2003 |
 |
The 3DMark 2003 did show an improvement in the Intel system with
about a 2.5% difference in scores. as you can see from the graph the nForce II system got closer when running
at 400MHz FSB bringing the nForce II system within 1.5% of the P4's score. |
 |
|
|
In both these tests it shows that the FSB has an impact on performance
and with the addition of PAT and Hyper-Threading it shows the Intel on
top. Keep in mind though these results are very close. You
would probably not be able to tell the difference in most
applications. |
|
|
|
|
|
Next
Code Creatures & Comanche 4 >>> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talk
about this review in the Forum |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |